Anthropic
live interviews“This is all you–no AI assistance unless we indicate otherwise.”
Also: Encourages AI when applying: create your first draft yourself, then use Claude to refine it. No AI in take-homes unless indicated.
Last checked
Of the 20 companies tracked here, 10 ban it outright, 1 discourages it, 4 allow it, 4 require it, and 1 has no published rule.
The full dataset is free to download and free to re-use under CC-BY-4.0. Subscribe to the changelog instead of re-scraping.
Published company policies on candidates using AI during the hiring process (applications, assessments, live interviews). Candidate side only; employer-side AI screening is out of scope. Every row carries a verbatim quote, its source URL, the source date where the source is dated, and the date we last checked it. Companies without a verifiable published position are excluded rather than guessed.
statusstagealsosource_dateFor the argument behind the numbers, and what a candidate should actually do about them, read the full write-up.
10 of 20. A published rule prohibiting candidate AI use in the stage named. Most pair it with an explicit disqualification warning.
“This is all you–no AI assistance unless we indicate otherwise.”
Also: Encourages AI when applying: create your first draft yourself, then use Claude to refine it. No AI in take-homes unless indicated.
Last checked
“To ensure a fair and transparent recruitment process, please do not use GenAI tools during your interview unless explicitly permitted.”
Also: Internal guidance warns that failure to adhere may result in disqualification from the recruitment process.
Last checked
“As a reminder, Goldman Sachs prohibits the use of any external sources, including ChatGPT or Google search engine, during the interview process.”
Also: Spokesperson: applies to all campus applicants across all positions. We want to hear from our applicants in their own voice.
Last checked
“To complete assessments, technical tests, or coding challenges; During live interviews or real-time assessments”
Also: Allows AI for resume polish, prep and mock practice, with disclosure of significant AI assistance. Violation may result in disqualification.
Last checked
“Using AI to complete assessments (coding challenges, language tasks, etc.) unless explicitly stated otherwise”
Also: Prohibited list also covers fabricated experience and voice cloning or deepfakes. Accenture states it uses proctoring tools and AI-detection methods.
Last checked
“While AI, including GenAI, can be useful in research, we tell candidates they should not use these tools during any assessment.”
Also: PwC adds that activity undermining the integrity of recruitment will result in action.
Last checked
“You'll also be asked to record a short integrity statement confirming your understanding and agreement of Deloitte's Integrity and AI use guidelines.”
Also: Candidates record an integrity statement and must keep assessment content away from AI tools.
Last checked
“No. The assessment is designed to understand your preferences, behaviors and how you might approach different situations.”
Last checked
“By completing our assessments, you are confirming that you are doing so independently and without the assistance of others, or any artificial intelligence or other resources, to provide responses that are not your own.”
Also: Candidates found to have acted dishonestly, including using AI, are withdrawn and further action may be taken.
Last checked
“During assessments and interviews, candidates should demonstrate their own skills without outside assistance unless explicitly permitted.”
Also: The same page encourages responsible and ethical AI use during preparation, as long as it reflects true capabilities.
Last checked
1 of 20. Written as an expectation rather than an enforceable prohibition, with no stated consequence.
“We ask that throughout your assessments and interviews you use your own words to describe your thoughts and ideas, without use of online aids, so that we can gather the best evidence we require to evaluate your suitability.”
Also: Phrased as an expectation rather than a ban, and says online aids rather than naming AI.
Last checked
4 of 20. Candidate AI use is permitted in the stage named, in some cases conditioned on disclosure.
“You let them use whatever they want.”
Also: Spoken description of practice by the VP of Engineering, not a formal written policy, made about director-level and above engineering hiring: candidates who do not use a copilot usually get creamed by someone who does.
Last checked
“This is more representative of the developer environment that our future employees will work in.”
Also: Reported from internal Meta communications seen by 404 Media describing a new AI-enabled coding interview type.
Last checked
“The interview is your chance to show us how you think with AI, not just that you use it.”
Also: Frames AI fluency as a signal evaluated across roles.
Last checked
“You may use AI to assist with your resume or cover letter, but the information must accurately represent your qualifications and skills.”
Also: Live interviews: engage without reading from AI-produced answers. Take-home AI use must be cited and answered in your own words.
Last checked
4 of 20. The interview is built around AI use, so not using it is the deviation rather than the default.
“we now expect Backend, Machine Learning and Frontend engineering candidates to use AI tools like Copilot, Cursor, and Claude during our technical interviews.”
Also: An AI-Assisted Coding round replaced the computer-science fundamentals screen.
Last checked
“In our revamped skills tests, we observe candidates working with AI in real time.”
Also: Zapier states a bar that new hires must be AI-fluent.
Last checked
“In the pilot, some graduate candidates were asked to use McKinsey's AI tool, Lilli, during case interviews.”
Also: Pilot-scoped, not all candidates: interviewers evaluated how applicants prompted the internal AI, assessed its outputs and applied conclusions to a client scenario.
Last checked
“come prepared to use the tools you'd use at work with us. We're not testing memorization or pattern recall; we're evaluating how you direct AI, how you critique its output, and how you exercise judgment to determine whether and when the model gets something wrong.”
Also: Interviews rebuilt to evaluate how candidates direct AI, critique its output and catch its mistakes.
Last checked
1 of 20. On the record about candidate AI use without setting a rule either way. Included because the absence is itself the finding.
“We'll introduce at least one round of in-person interviews for people just to make sure the fundamentals are there.”
Also: No explicit published ban. The stated response to AI-aided candidates is procedural: adding at least one in-person interview round.
Last checked
Released under CC-BY-4.0. You may copy, republish and build on it, including commercially, as long as you credit the source. Use this line:
AI Interview Policy Tracker by UnchartedCareer, https://unchartedcareer.com/blog/companies-that-ban-ai-in-interviews, CC BY 4.0